My MacGregor Line of Descent

                                               My MacGregor Line of Descent

1. William Augustus Harless (1911-199)
+Violet Memphis Wetherholt 1906-1982)

2. William Hamilton Harless (1878-1960)
+Anna Pauley (1885-1965)

3. Augustus Harless (1845-1925)
+Rachel E. Stover 1852-1905)

4. Jubel Stover ( 1817-1894)
+ Mary Jane Doughty (1826-1907)

5. Elijah Stover (c. 1789-1824)
+Mary "Polly" Scarborough (1799-1843)

6. Jacob Stover (c. 1764-1784)
+Sarah "Sally McGhee (1767-1836)

7. James Mackgehee (1698-1774)
+ Rebecca Rebecka Prewitt (1702-1748

8. WilliamMackgahaye Mackgehee (1672- 1748)
+Mary Carr (1704-1751)

9. William Mackgahaye (1653-1712)
+Unknown

10 Patrick A. MacGregor (1607-1661)
+Marion MacDonald (1600-1678)

11. Duncan Abberach MacGregor (1550-1609)
+Christian McFarlane  

12. Gregor MacGregor (1520-1552)
+Isobel Cameron (1530-1586)

13.  Duncan Ladassach MacGregor (1490-1552)
+Mary Campbell (1492-)

14. Gregor Patrickson MacGregor (1460-1547)
+Finvola Flora MacArthur Campbell (1410-)

15.John or Patrick MacGregor (c. 1430-1518)
+daughter of the Laird of McLachlan

16. Gregor MacGregor (c. 1400-)
+Unknown

17.Gregor Aluin MacGregor (c. 1360- 1415)
+Iric McAlpin

18. Iain Camm Macgregor c. 1330-1390)
+Dervogill McLachlan

19.Gregor Of The Golden Bridles(c. 1330-c.1360)

20. Malcolm MacGregor


1 comment:

Jo Stewart said...

This is not recognised peerage documentation or primary-source royal genealogy. It is a personal Blogspot genealogy page. As per peerage records in the United Kingdom you are not related to royalty or the scottish nobility by descent

There is an enormous difference between:
• a user-assembled medieval lineage website,
and
• historically verified dynastic evidence recognised through archival genealogy and peerage scholarship.

The problem with many of these online “medieval genealogy” sites is that they often merge:
• unsourced medieval trees,
• speculative clan connections,
• repetitive naming assumptions,
• and internet genealogy loops
without sufficient documentary continuity.

A visually long lineage does not automatically equal a historically authenticated one.

For example, tracing modern American families back into medieval Scottish clans such as the MacGregors requires:
• parish continuity,
• probate records,
• land succession,
• heraldic verification,
• clan documentation,
• and chronologically verifiable parent-child linkage.

Without that, the medieval portion of the tree frequently becomes speculative reconstruction rather than established genealogy.

The same issue applies when online trees suddenly connect individuals into:
• Plantagenets,
• Stuarts,
• Capetians,
• Templars,
• or crusader dynasties.

Serious historical genealogy is not based on:
• blogs,
• GEDmatch uploads,
• WikiTree merges,
• or copied ancestry chains.

It is based on:
• archival records,
• peerage documentation,
• heraldic authority,
• wills,
• court rolls,
• ecclesiastical records,
• and verified generational continuity.

As someone descended through documented Capetian, Plantagenet, Beaufort, and Stewart/Stuart lines, I say this respectfully: the archive matters more than internet genealogy aesthetics.

A Blogspot page is not equivalent to recognised historical proof of royal or dynastic descent.

 
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.